27 May Antivirus Performance Comparison
These viruses can do various things, from stealing your hard disk space to gaining access to your personal information or draining your CPU. There are many anti-virus programs available to guard avastantivirusreview.com/avast-won-t-open-on-windows-10 your gadgets from these problems. The key is to choose one that has the least impact on your system’s performance. All of our antivirus software is tested against this aspect. The results depend on how long it takes each program to complete an operation. Kaspersky Security Cloud Free, for example, had a background effect of 6% when running a full scan, while ESET had an impact of 12%.
Avira is a German company, has a solid reputation in our tests. It consistently scores above 90% in the three categories of Protection (False positives), Performance (False Positives) and Usability. Its user interface offers a wide range of features that includes a smart «firewall» and various privacy tools. Avira subscriptions are priced per month instead of for a fixed time period of 1-3 years. This makes it easier to cancel your subscription or change the terms at anytime.
Essentware, formerly known as PCKeeper, is a relatively new name to our tests. It uses the Avira Engine underneath the hood. Overall, it scored well. Its performance and interface are both easy to use however, some issues with stability which included scanning jobs freezing that have led to a lower rating. The detection was excellent and a perfect run of the certification sets earned VB100.